Site Logo
All articles
Commentary on News

Qualitative Analysis: Serious Illness Care Surveys

Evidano6 min read

Qualitative analysis of serious illness care surveys is essential for turning patient and caregiver narratives into reliable quality measures.

Key Takeaways

Evidano is an AI-powered qualitative data analysis platform that automates transcription, codebook alignment, and thematic analysis. RAND published a methodological report on July 15, 2026 that produces draft patient surveys for assessing serious illness care in home-based and community settings, and the report’s layered qualitative workflow can be reproduced quickly using automated transcription and AI-assisted coding.

  • RAND’s report (published July 15, 2026) produced draft survey instruments after an environmental scan, an expert panel, 23 in-depth interviews, 9 provider interviews, and 53 cognitive interviews.
  • Core domains prioritized include communication; access/responsiveness; shared decision-making and advance care planning; symptom management; continuity/coordination; emotional/spiritual support; referrals for social determinants; caregiver support; and medication management.
  • Evidano automates transcription with custom dictionaries and PII redaction, aligns or imports codebooks, applies AI-assisted hierarchical coding across n=85+ interviews or open-text responses, and produces thematic and cross-segment reports within days.

Fast take: What changed (source)

RAND published a methodological report on July 15, 2026 that produces draft patient surveys for assessing serious illness care in home-based and community settings. Read the full report at RAND.

  • Goal: create patient-reported measures to monitor and improve serious illness programs.
  • Methods combined expert panel input, qualitative interviews, and cognitive testing to refine item wording and domains.

Findings snapshot

ItemDetailSource / Note
Publication dateJuly 15, 2026RAND
Primary methodsEnvironmental scan; expert panel; qualitative interviews; cognitive testing
In-depth interviews23 seriously ill individuals and/or family caregivers
Provider interviews9 health care providers
Cognitive interviews53 seriously ill individuals and/or family caregivers
OutcomeDraft survey instruments for home-based and community-based serious illness care

What the study did and why it matters

RAND used a layered qualitative approach combining an environmental scan, an expert panel, interviews, and iterative cognitive testing. RAND mapped existing measures, prioritized domains via an expert panel, conducted interviews with patients, caregivers, and providers to surface lived-experience language, and performed iterative cognitive testing to simplify wording and ensure items cover telehealth and in-person contexts.

  • Core domains prioritized: communication; access/responsiveness; shared decision-making & advance care planning; symptom management; continuity/coordination; emotional/spiritual support; social determinants referrals; caregiver support; medication management.
  • Survey wording was simplified (for example, “health care options if you got sicker”) and generalized to “health care professionals” for community-based assessments.

Implications for researchers: qualitative analysis of serious illness care surveys

For qualitative researchers & UX teams

Qualitative researchers and UX teams should prioritize domain validity and use RAND-aligned phrasing when coding transcripts and designing instruments.

Prioritize domain validity: map codes to the RAND list of core domains to ensure content validity when you code transcripts or open-text survey responses.

Use cognitive-test-driven phrasing in instruments and probes to reduce respondent confusion and cross-walk existing datasets.

Compare telehealth vs in-person data explicitly, because RAND’s instrument wording was adjusted to cover both modalities.

For program leads & quality analysts

Program leads and quality analysts should translate themes into measurable indicators for routine monitoring.

Translate themes into measurable indicators (for example, percent of respondents reporting timely access) for routine monitoring.

Use mixed-methods: combine patient-reported survey scores with qualitative quotes to explain trends to stakeholders and accrediting bodies.

For policy & accreditation teams

Policy and accreditation teams should use standardized patient-reported measures for benchmarking across home-based and community programs.

Standardized patient-reported measures allow benchmarking across home-based and community programs, RAND provides an evidence-based starting point.

Document your cognitive testing and sampling (n counts above) to support measure reliability claims.

Do more, faster with Evidano

From raw interviews to clean transcripts

Evidano automates transcription with custom dictionaries and PII redaction, useful when RAND-style interviews include medical terms or family names.

Codebook alignment & AI-assisted coding

Evidano can import the RAND domain codebook or create one from scratch and apply hierarchical codes to maintain consistency across n=85+ interviews or open-text survey responses.

Import the RAND domain codebook or create one from scratch; Evidano applies hierarchical codes→subcodes and AI-assisted coding to maintain consistency across n=85+ interviews or open-text survey responses.

Thematic, frequency & cross-segment analysis

Evidano runs thematic analysis, frequency counts, and cross-segment comparisons (for example, caregiver vs patient responses; telehealth vs in-person) in minutes rather than weeks.

Run thematic analysis, frequency counts, and cross-segment comparisons (e.g., caregiver vs patient responses; telehealth vs in-person) in minutes, not weeks.

Visualize & share

Evidano generates word clouds, co-occurrence networks, and hierarchical code maps to make the RAND domains actionable for stakeholders.

Generate word clouds, co-occurrence networks, and hierarchical code maps to make the RAND domains actionable for stakeholders.

Security & compliance

Evidano encrypts data end-to-end and does not use client data to train third-party models, suitable for sensitive patient-reported data.

A reminder for health research: Evidano encrypts data end-to-end and does not use client data to train third-party models, suitable for sensitive patient-reported data.

Checklist: run this RAND-inspired workflow in one sprint

You can run a RAND-inspired workflow in a two-week pilot sprint using the following checklist.

  • Week 1: Import existing materials and transcripts into Evidano; run automated transcription and normalize terminology with a custom dictionary.
  • Week 1: Import or create the RAND-based domain codebook; run AI-assisted initial coding across interviews.
  • Week 2: Perform thematic and cross-segment analyses (telehealth vs in-person; caregiver vs patient).
  • Week 2: Produce visuals (co-occurrence, hierarchical codes) and extract representative quotes for each domain.
  • Deliver: a one-page quality monitoring dashboard plus a 2–3 page decision memo for program leads.

Ethics & safeguards (short note)

When working with serious illness data, ensure informed consent, limit PHI exposure, and follow your IRB or organizational privacy rules.

RAND’s work is research-focused; patient-reported measures are not diagnostic tools. When working with serious illness data, ensure informed consent, limit PHI exposure, and follow your IRB or organizational privacy rules.

FAQ: serious illness care surveys

What did RAND publish on July 15, 2026?

RAND published a methodological report that produces draft patient surveys for assessing serious illness care in home-based and community settings.

The report produced draft survey instruments after an environmental scan, an expert panel, in-depth interviews, provider interviews, and cognitive testing.

How many interviews and cognitive tests did RAND conduct?

RAND conducted 23 in-depth interviews, 9 provider interviews, and 53 cognitive interviews as part of the study.

The in-depth interviews involved 23 seriously ill individuals and/or family caregivers, there were 9 health care provider interviews, and 53 cognitive interviews with seriously ill individuals and/or family caregivers.

What core domains did RAND prioritize?

RAND prioritized domains including communication; access/responsiveness; shared decision-making and advance care planning; symptom management; continuity/coordination; emotional/spiritual support; referrals for social determinants; caregiver support; and medication management.

Core domains prioritized are communication; access/responsiveness; shared decision-making & advance care planning; symptom management; continuity/coordination; emotional/spiritual support; social determinants referrals; caregiver support; medication management.

How can researchers reproduce RAND’s workflow quickly?

Researchers can reproduce RAND’s layered qualitative workflow quickly by combining automated transcription, cognitive-test-driven wording, codebook alignment, and AI-assisted coding.

Use automated transcription and custom dictionaries, import or create the RAND-based domain codebook, run AI-assisted initial coding, perform thematic and cross-segment analyses, and produce visuals and representative quotes for stakeholders.

Wrapping up; Next steps

RAND’s July 15, 2026 report provides tested domains and a reproducible qualitative workflow you can copy.

If you want to shrink transcription and coding timelines, import your interviews or survey open-text into Evidano to auto-transcribe, align codebooks, and produce thematic and cross-segment reports ready for quality teams and accrediting bodies.

  • Start a pilot: upload one cohort of interviews or 200 open-text survey responses and see domain-level metrics and exemplar quotes within days.
  • Try Evidano for free to map RAND’s domains to your measurement plan or request a demo at Evidano.
Company
About
Newsletter

Product updates, research, and tips — straight to your inbox.

© Evidano, All Rights Reserved.