Features
Interviewer: What made you decide to leave the program? Participant: Honestly, the commute. Two buses each way, and once my shift changed I could not make the evening sessions anymore, even though I wanted to finish.
Interviewer: What made you decide to leave the program? Participant: Honestly, the commute. Two buses each way, and once my shift changed I could not make the evening sessions anymore, even though I wanted to finish.
Interviewer: What made you decide to leave the program? Participant: Honestly, the commute. Two buses each way, and once my shift changed I could not make the evening sessions anymore, even though I wanted to finish.
Interviewer: What made you decide to leave the program? Participant: Honestly, the commute. Two buses each way, and once my shift changed I could not make the evening sessions anymore, even though I wanted to finish.
All Lengths & Languages
Analyze any document, any language, any format
Thematic Analysis
Get codebook, themes, quotes, and more
Content Analysis
Get answers to questions
Frequency Analysis
Track key concepts, viewpoints, themes, and codes
Cross-segment Analysis
Compare insights across gender, region, etc.
Custom Reports
Generate interactive reports with key findings
Chat with your documents
Ask questions to your documents
AI Avatar Interviewer
Conduct intelligent interviews automatically
AI Transcription
Convert video/ speech to text with high accuracy
Document Translation
Translate entire documents
Get Social Media/ Web Data
Extract data from websites
Data Visualizations
Insightful graphical data representations
Chat with Analysis
Share and Collaborate
Let others edit, view, and chat with your project

Create audio/ video clip reels
Generate multimedia clips organized by key perspectives to tell a more engaging story
Cohen's kappa
0.000
Chance-corrected agreement between the AI coder and your human review.
95% CI: 0.000 to 0.000
True positive accuracy
0.0%
Among AI-coded decisions, the share you confirmed as correct.
95% CI: 0.0% to 0.0%
True negative accuracy
0.0%
Among AI-not-coded decisions, the share you confirmed as correct.
95% CI: 0.0% to 0.0%
Accuracy by theme, sub-theme or code
124 of 124 reviewed · 115 correct · 9 wrong · 93% accuracy
| Code | Reviewed | Correct | Wrong | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jargon | 17 of 17 | 14 | 3 | 82% |
| Travel burden | 21 of 21 | 19 | 2 | 90% |
| Being listened to | 28 of 28 | 26 | 2 | 93% |
| Family support | 24 of 24 | 23 | 1 | 96% |
| Waiting times | 34 of 34 | 33 | 1 | 97% |
AI Accuracy & Inter-coder Agreement
Check the AI's coding against your own review, and report the statistics reviewers ask for
Codebook
Trust in clinicians · Being listened to
“She wrote everything down before she looked at me. I was the last thing in the room.”
rahul.k@university.edu
Coding this as relational trust rather than institutional trust — participants keep separating the two.
amara.m@university.edu
@rahul.k@university.edu I widened the definition after interview 3. Noting it here so the change stays on the record.
sofia.l@university.edu
My own clinical background may be shaping how I read this quote — revisit after the next round of coding.
Someone is writing a memo…
Research Memos & Reflexivity Journal
Keep analytic decisions and reflections attached to the theme, code, or quote they belong to
Codes(# documents/ participants)
Interview 07.docx
Context from AI: Participant contrasts this with an earlier consultation where the clinician started with a question.
Versioned Codebook & Audit Trail
Every codebook edit is saved as a version you can compare, attribute, and defend
