Evidano home
Commentary on News

Five Hajj Sun-Safety Themes: AI Qualitative Analysis

Evidano8 min read

Researchers, public-health teams, and healthcare organizations often need to turn interview transcripts into clear interventions without losing cultural context. The November 11, 2026 PLoS One study on sun protection during Hajj shows why that work is difficult: participants discussed heat, UV exposure, religious beliefs, language barriers, product access, and clothing constraints in the same interviews. AI qualitative analysis can help research teams organize those overlapping experiences, compare participant groups, and identify recurring themes while keeping human interpretation central. This article explains what the study found, how its qualitative method worked, and how AI-assisted thematic analysis can support similar health and UX research. The article is research-focused and non-diagnostic; its findings should inform further public-health research rather than individual medical advice.

Key Takeaways

According to the PLoS One study on sun protection during Hajj, researchers interviewed 29 people after the 2025 Hajj season and identified five themes about sun exposure, UV and UPF awareness, culture, barriers, and possible improvements.

The study shows that qualitative health research must distinguish heat-related illness from ultraviolet-related harm, because participants commonly understood sun exposure as a heat problem while knowing less about UV protection.

  • Between June 20 and July 11, 2025, researchers conducted retrospective Zoom interviews with 16 Saudi pilgrims and 13 registered nurses.
  • The researchers identified five major themes using Braun and Clarke’s six-phase thematic analysis approach.
  • The study found that participants had limited understanding of UPF-rated clothing, UV-protective umbrellas, and the UV Index.
  • Participants identified language, cost, availability, comfort, cultural clothing norms, and religious interpretations of hardship as barriers to sun protection.
  • The study recommended multilingual pre-Hajj education, affordable protective products, and culturally appropriate health communication.

How the Hajj Qualitative Study Worked

The 2026 PLoS One study used post-Hajj semi-structured interviews to explore how pilgrims and nurses understood and practiced sun protection.

The study team interviewed 16 Saudi pilgrims and 13 registered nurses within approximately one month after the 2025 Hajj season. The interviews lasted approximately 30 to 45 minutes, were conducted in Arabic or English, and were transcribed verbatim.

According to the study authors, Arabic transcripts were translated into English, and an independent bilingual researcher audited a random 20% sample of translated transcripts against the original Arabic recordings. Participants were also invited to review their transcripts.

The researchers used NVivo 12.6, independently coded an initial 20% sample of transcripts, resolved discrepancies through team discussion, and applied Braun and Clarke’s six-phase approach. The team reported reaching saturation after 16 pilgrim interviews and 13 nurse interviews.

The study identified a central analytical distinction: hydration, rest, and cooling address heat-related illness, while sunscreen and UPF-rated clothing or umbrellas address UV exposure. Shade can contribute to protection from both hazards, but the study authors noted that ordinary and UPF-rated products are not necessarily equivalent.

One pilgrim described the knowledge gap directly: "I didn’t even know there are special fabrics for blocking UV rays."

Hajj Sun-Protection Research Snapshot

Date or study detailMetricValueResearch implication
June 20 to July 11, 2025Interview period22 daysThe interviews captured recalled experiences soon after the 2025 Hajj season.
2025 Hajj seasonPilgrim participants16 Saudi pilgrimsThe pilgrim findings reflect one national group and should not be generalized to all international pilgrims.
2025 Hajj seasonNurse participants13 registered nursesNurses contributed professional observations about communication, education, and care barriers.
2026 PLoS One publicationTotal participants29 peopleThe dataset supported comparison between pilgrim and nurse perspectives.
2026 PLoS One analysisMajor themes5 themesThe themes connected physical effects, knowledge gaps, culture, barriers, and recommendations.
2026 PLoS One resultsPrior related finding cited by the authors26.9% of pilgrims did not use umbrellas in direct sunlightThe cited figure illustrates a gap between exposure risk and protective behavior.

Implications for Public-Health and Qualitative Researchers

Why should researchers separate heat and UV themes during coding?

Researchers should code heat-related illness and UV-related harm as related but distinct concepts, according to the 2026 PLoS One study.

The study reports that participants described exhaustion, dizziness, dehydration, and fainting, but rarely raised UV-specific effects such as sunburn or eye irritation. A coding framework that combines every sun-related statement could hide important differences in prevention needs.

How can qualitative teams analyze cultural and religious context without reducing it to a barrier?

Qualitative teams should code cultural and religious meanings as contextual influences that can either discourage or support protective behavior, according to the Hajj interviews.

The study reported that some participants viewed enduring sun exposure as part of spiritual hardship, while other participants described umbrella use as increasingly accepted. The finding suggests that intervention research should test culturally compatible messages instead of treating culture as a fixed obstacle.

Why do multilingual interviews require special analytical controls?

Multilingual qualitative research requires translation checks because language differences can alter the meaning, emphasis, or cultural context of participant accounts.

The study reported that nurses faced difficulty communicating with pilgrims who did not speak Arabic or English. One nurse called language "the biggest challenge" and said that sign-language translators were sometimes needed. The researchers addressed translation risk through bilingual translation, a 20% audit, and participant transcript review.

What should researchers preserve when using AI for qualitative analysis?

Researchers should preserve participant quotations, source context, language information, subgroup identity, and an auditable link between codes and original transcript passages when using AI.

The Hajj study used multiple coders, consensus discussions, member checking, reflexive practices, and trustworthiness criteria. AI can accelerate organization and comparison, but those safeguards remain important for interpretation and reporting.

How Evidano Supports AI Qualitative Analysis

Problem: Interview transcripts take too long to synthesize

Evidano is an AI-powered qualitative data analysis platform that helps researchers analyze interviews, open-ended surveys, and documents.

Evidano can organize interview transcripts into thematic, content, frequency, and cross-segment analyses, helping researchers examine themes such as heat risk, UV knowledge, cultural influence, and access barriers across pilgrims and nurses. Researchers can review the underlying material through Evidano’s qualitative research features.

Problem: Translation can obscure meaning across participant groups

Evidano supports translation workflows with custom dictionaries, which can help research teams standardize domain-specific terms while reviewing multilingual qualitative data.

For studies involving Arabic, English, or other languages, researchers should still validate translated meanings against the original transcript and retain human review. Evidano’s translation capabilities are relevant for organizing multilingual research, not for replacing methodological quality checks.

Problem: Researchers need to compare themes by participant segment

Evidano supports cross-segment analysis, allowing teams to compare how different participant groups describe the same issue.

A health-research team could compare pilgrim and nurse perspectives on UV awareness, communication barriers, product cost, and cultural clothing constraints, then use frequency and thematic outputs to identify where perspectives converge or diverge.

Problem: Research teams need answers across many source files

Evidano provides AI chat over uploaded documents and analyses, allowing researchers to ask focused questions across an evidence set.

A team could ask which barriers were reported by nurses but not pilgrims, which quotations support the education recommendation, or how often participants distinguished heat from UV exposure. Researchers should verify AI-generated answers against source passages before publication.

Problem: Sensitive health interviews require data safeguards

Evidano encrypts data and does not use customer data to train third-party models, according to Evidano’s platform information.

Research teams handling interview transcripts should also follow their institutional ethics approvals, consent requirements, de-identification procedures, and data-retention policies.

FAQ: AI Qualitative Analysis for Hajj Health Research

What did the 2026 Hajj sun-protection study find?

The 2026 PLoS One study found five themes: physical and emotional effects of sun exposure, limited awareness, cultural influences, practical barriers, and recommendations for improvement.

The study analyzed interviews with 16 pilgrims and 13 nurses conducted between June 20 and July 11, 2025.

How many participants were included in the Hajj qualitative study?

The study included 29 participants: 16 Saudi pilgrims and 13 registered nurses.

The authors assessed saturation separately for the two groups and reported reaching it after 16 pilgrim interviews and 13 nurse interviews.

What is the difference between heat protection and UV protection?

Heat protection focuses on hydration, rest, cooling, and shade, while UV protection focuses on reducing ultraviolet exposure with sunscreen and UPF-rated clothing or umbrellas, according to the 2026 PLoS One study.

The study found that participants often understood sun exposure mainly as a heat risk, which could lead to incomplete UV-protection advice.

How can AI help analyze qualitative health interviews?

AI can help researchers organize transcripts, identify recurring concepts, compare participant segments, surface supporting quotations, and summarize documents.

Human researchers must still validate codes, quotations, translations, interpretations, and ethical handling of sensitive data, as demonstrated by the study’s use of independent coding, consensus discussions, translation audits, and member checking.

Can AI qualitative analysis replace human thematic analysis?

AI qualitative analysis should support, not replace, human thematic analysis.

The Hajj study used reflexivity, investigator triangulation, participant review, and collaborative theme refinement, showing why contextual judgment and transparent validation remain necessary.

Conclusion and Next Steps for AI Qualitative Analysis

The 2026 PLoS One Hajj study shows how interviews can reveal the difference between recognizing sun exposure and understanding the specific actions needed to reduce heat and UV risks.

The study’s 29 interviews and five themes also show why qualitative teams need structured coding, subgroup comparison, translation safeguards, and traceable evidence. AI qualitative analysis can make those workflows faster while preserving researcher review and cultural context.

Researchers analyzing interviews, open-ended surveys, or multilingual health documents can use Evidano to organize themes, compare segments, and query their evidence base. Try Evidano for free to begin analyzing qualitative data.

Topics

  • AI qualitative analysis
  • AI thematic analysis
  • qualitative health research
  • Hajj sun protection research
  • multilingual interview analysis

Keep reading

Browse all articles