Arts-Based Interventions for Humanitarian Staff Care

According to PLOS Global Public Health, in the July 22, 2026 interview with lead author Hannah Strohmeier the study used in-depth interviews to explore whether arts-based interventions (ABIs) could complement existing humanitarian staff care portfolios (PLOS Global Public Health).

• The study interviewed 10 in-house mental health professionals, and 8 were asked specifically about ABIs, as reported on July 22, 2026.
• Recruitment took about one year to complete the 10 interviews, according to Hannah Strohmeier in July 2026.
• Participants were generally positive about ABIs: Strohmeier said, "What stood out to my co-author and me most was the openness participants showed toward new and complementary initiatives, " on July 22, 2026.
• Strohmeier noted that ABIs "can help articulate experiences that are otherwise hard to put into words, " highlighting their value for trauma and language-diverse settings.

Answer: The study used qualitative, semi-structured interviews to gather in-house mental health professionals' perspectives on arts-based interventions.

According to Hannah Strohmeier in the July 22, 2026 PLOS Global Public Health interview, the research was embedded in a larger postdoctoral project at Charité Center for Global Health and used an interview guide that included a focused set of questions on ABIs.

According to the authors, participant recruitment was difficult: it took roughly one year to secure and complete 10 interviews, and eight participants were asked specifically about ABIs, which limits generalizability but supports exploratory insight.

According to Hannah Strohmeier and co-author Christiane Ganter-Argast, the design prioritized depth over breadth, using in-depth interviews to surface barriers, anticipated implementation challenges, and perceived benefits for staff wellbeing.

Answer: The PLOS Global Public Health interview implies ABIs are promising complements but require staged research and pilot testing before scale.

According to Hannah Strohmeier in the July 22, 2026 interview, humanitarian organisations already use informal ABIs at retreats, but systematic documentation and piloting are missing.

Researchers should first map existing informal uses, as Strohmeier recommends, then design small pilot studies to test modality preference, frequency, and outcomes in context, reporting methods and ethical safeguards.

Program leads should note operational barriers named in the interview: limited staff time, confidentiality constraints, and uneven access between national and international staff, all of which affect feasibility and equity.

Arts-based interventions appear promising as complements to humanitarian staff care, according to the July 22, 2026 PLOS Global Public Health interview, but evidence remains exploratory and focused on feasibility.

Researchers should follow the staged approach Strohmeier recommends: document informal uses, run targeted pilots, then evaluate outcomes with ethical safeguards.

If you run qualitative pilots or need to synthesize small, hard-to-reach samples, AI-enabled tools can accelerate coding, cross-segment analysis, and reporting; see Evidano features for relevant capabilities.

Ready to analyze interview transcripts, open-ended surveys, and pilot data with AI-assisted rigor? Try Evidano for free.