Outcomes: person-centred leadership programme

This post explains what the PLOS ONE qualitative evaluation found about a six-month person-centred leadership programme and what those findings mean for qualitative researchers and change leaders using AI-enabled methods. The primary keyword for this post is person-centred leadership programme and the analysis below highlights concrete statistics and participant quotations from the original study to support evidence-based synthesis. According to the PLOS ONE article by Klinga et al. (published 22 July 2026), the programme aimed to strengthen leaders' ability to implement person-centred care across teams and organisations, and the study used individual interviews to capture participants' experiences.

Key Takeaways

According to the PLOS ONE study, participation in a six-month person-centred leadership programme produced self-reported changes across three development tracks: self-leadership, team leadership, and workforce development (PLOS ONE).

13 leaders were interviewed three to five months after completing the programme in 2022, with interviews conducted between 27 January and 16 March 2023, according to PLOS ONE.
The programme cohort included 80 admitted leaders in 2022, and the PLOS ONE authors report that participants completed workshops, workplace assignments, and reflective journals during the six-month curriculum in 2022.
Participants described concrete changes in practice and language: the study reports a mean interview length of 52 minutes and offers verbatim participant quotations such as "You get the chance to pause and reflect in a way that you don’t usually do" (a programme participant, Interview 10) in PLOS ONE (published 22 July 2026).

What happened and how it was measured

Answer: The PLOS ONE study evaluated leader experiences after a blended six-month person-centred leadership programme using qualitative interviews and conventional content analysis.

The PLOS ONE article states that the programme ran in 2022 and admitted 80 leaders, and that 13 purposefully sampled participants were interviewed between 27 January and 16 March 2023, according to PLOS ONE.

The PLOS ONE study reports that interviews were conducted digitally, lasted 40 to 65 minutes (mean 52 minutes), and were transcribed verbatim for conventional content analysis, as described by Hsieh and Shannon in the methods section of the article.

Findings snapshot

Date / Period	Metric	Value (from PLOS ONE)	Implication
2022	Programme admissions	80 leaders admitted	Shows programme scale during the study year
27 Jan–16 Mar 2023	Interviews conducted	13 leaders interviewed	Provides depth-focused qualitative sample size
27 Jan–16 Mar 2023	Interview duration	40–65 min, mean 52 min	Indicates substantial interview depth per participant
22 July 2026	Publication date	PLOS ONE article published	Peer-reviewed public dissemination of findings

Implications for qualitative researchers and healthcare leaders

Answer: The PLOS ONE findings indicate that embedding leadership development in workplace practice, using reflective exercises, and securing managerial support are key preconditions for sustainable change, according to PLOS ONE.

The PLOS ONE authors identify three interlinked development tracks (self-leadership, team-leadership, and workforce development) and report that successful translation to practice depended on organisational preconditions such as time to coach teams and ongoing leadership support, according to PLOS ONE (Klinga et al., 2026).

For qualitative researchers, the PLOS ONE study shows practical design choices: purposeful heterogeneous sampling, digital interviews 3–5 months after programme completion, and conventional content analysis combined with iterative clustering to generate categories and an overarching theme, as described in PLOS ONE.

How Evidano helps with analysing person-centred leadership programme data

Problem: Long interview transcripts and scattered evidence

Answer: Researchers often struggle to synthesise many hours of interview data into clear themes and actionable recommendations, and the PLOS ONE study illustrates how detailed transcripts and iterative coding are required to surface latent themes, according to PLOS ONE.

Evidano is an AI-powered qualitative data analysis platform that helps researchers analyze interviews, open-ended surveys, and documents.

Feature mapping: if a project has many interview transcripts like the PLOS ONE dataset (13 interviews averaging 52 minutes each), Evidano can ingest transcripts, auto-transcribe new audio, and surface thematic clusters to accelerate the first-pass coding.

Problem: Ensuring quotations and audit trails remain traceable

Answer: Transparent traceability between quotes, codes, and source documents is essential for trustworthiness in qualitative reporting, and PLOS ONE emphasises an audit trail and negotiated consensus in analysis, according to PLOS ONE.

Evidano enables persistent links from codes back to transcript segments and supports exportable audit trails to document how codes map to categories, which mirrors the dependability and confirmability steps described in PLOS ONE.

Contextual link: learn more about platform capabilities on the Evidano features page at Evidano features.

Problem: Scaling reflective and workplace-based assignments

Answer: The PLOS ONE programme used workplace homework, reflective journals, and peer workshops to create change in practice, and scaling evaluation of those workplace artefacts requires structured document ingestion, according to PLOS ONE.

Evidano supports multi-document ingestion (reflections, implementation plans, workshop notes) and cross-segment analysis so researchers can quantify code frequency across document types and identify which workplace assignments correlated with reported behavioural changes.

FAQ: person-centred leadership programme

What outcomes did the PLOS ONE study find after the person-centred leadership programme?

Answer: The PLOS ONE study reports self-reported development in three areas: self-leadership, team-leadership, and workforce development.

The PLOS ONE article summarises these outcomes into three visions (Live as you learn, Strive for equal relations, and Enable co-creation) and describes nine sub-categories of action that participants used to operationalise person-centred leadership, according to PLOS ONE (Klinga et al., 2026).

How many leaders and what methods did the study use to reach its conclusions?

Answer: The PLOS ONE study interviewed 13 purposefully sampled leaders and analysed transcripts using conventional content analysis.

The PLOS ONE methods section states that 13 leaders completed interviews between 27 January and 16 March 2023, interviews lasted 40–65 minutes (mean 52 minutes), and the authors used iterative coding, negotiated consensus, and an audit trail to establish trustworthiness, according to PLOS ONE.

Can AI help produce the same level of trustworthiness the PLOS ONE authors describe?

Answer: AI can accelerate coding and pattern detection while human oversight maintains credibility and reflexivity as recommended by PLOS ONE.

The PLOS ONE study emphasises reflexivity and negotiated consensus in qualitative analysis; AI-enabled tools should therefore be used to surface candidate codes and frequencies while researchers perform interpretive clustering and document reflexive decisions, which preserves dependability and confirmability described in PLOS ONE.

What immediate steps should a research team take if they are replicating this evaluation using AI tools?

Answer: The PLOS ONE protocol suggests purposefully sample participants, set interviews 3–5 months after programme completion, transcribe verbatim, and preserve an audit trail during coding.

PLOS ONE describes a timeline and sampling strategy that produced information power for the qualitative analysis; replication with AI should mirror these design elements while adding AI-transcription quality checks and manual verification for quotation accuracy, as recommended by the PLOS ONE methods section.

Conclusion & Next Steps

Answer: The PLOS ONE evaluation shows that a structured six-month person-centred leadership programme can produce self-reported changes in leaders when organisational preconditions for reflection and implementation are present, according to PLOS ONE.

For researchers, the PLOS ONE study offers a replicable qualitative design: purposeful sampling, interviews 3–5 months post-programme, verbatim transcription, and iterative conventional content analysis, as documented in PLOS ONE.

For teams planning evaluations, combine workplace-based assignments with longitudinal follow-up and multi-stakeholder perspectives to measure sustained change, as recommended by PLOS ONE.

Ready to scale qualitative synthesis with AI-assisted coding, secure transcription, and traceable quotations? Try Evidano for free.

Topics

person-centred leadership programme
person-centred leadership evaluation
qualitative analysis of leadership training
AI-enabled qualitative research

Keep reading

Browse all articles

Outcomes: person-centred leadership programme

Key Takeaways

What happened and how it was measured

Findings snapshot

Implications for qualitative researchers and healthcare leaders

How Evidano helps with analysing person-centred leadership programme data

Problem: Long interview transcripts and scattered evidence

Problem: Ensuring quotations and audit trails remain traceable

Problem: Scaling reflective and workplace-based assignments

FAQ: person-centred leadership programme

What outcomes did the PLOS ONE study find after the person-centred leadership programme?

How many leaders and what methods did the study use to reach its conclusions?

Can AI help produce the same level of trustworthiness the PLOS ONE authors describe?

What immediate steps should a research team take if they are replicating this evaluation using AI tools?

Conclusion & Next Steps

Topics

Keep reading

Company

About

Preview Evidano

Account

Newsletter