If you are running a qualitative analysis of hearing program pilots, the SOUND-BITES protocol (Tang et al., PLoS One, published 14 July 2026) is a practical model: mixed-methods, n≈600 clients, 60 volunteers, and optional audio interviews mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework. This post shows how to turn that raw field material into rigorous themes, stakeholder-ready visuals, and cross-segment comparisons using AI-enabled qualitative research. We will (1) summarize the study’s data types and timeline, (2) show key coding and validity checkpoints the authors plan, and (3) map each step to Evidano capabilities, from secure transcription and PII redaction to automated thematic, frequency and cross-segment analysis. Read on for a 7-step workflow you can run in a pilot and a short checklist to avoid common pitfalls. Want to test this on your own pilot transcripts? Start a secure trial at Evidano.
Run this analysis on your own data
Start freeTopics
- SOUND-BITES qualitative analysis
- hearing program evaluation
- AI-assisted qualitative analysis
- secure transcription
- Meals on Wheels hearing checks
Run this analysis on your own data
Evidano codes documents, interviews, survey responses and spreadsheets with AI, with your judgment in control at every step — and a free plan that doesn't expire.
Keep reading
- Commentary on NewsAI for Scientific Research: AI-enabled Qualitative ResearchHow AI-enabled qualitative research can speed literature synthesis and evidence checks for scientists. Learn practical workflows and start a free Evidano trial.
- Commentary on NewsFaster Insights: AI-assisted qualitative analysisAI-assisted qualitative analysis for implementation studies: practical guidance based on the PLOS One QLiNCaM study. Learn methods, numbers, and how Evidano speeds synthesis.
- Commentary on NewsAI-assisted qualitative analysis for museum observationsHow AI-enabled qualitative analysis accelerates coding and insight from museum visitor observations. Learn methods and stats from PLOS ONE, and try Evidano.
