Qualitative Analysis of Translated Scales

If you run surveys, interviews or validations across languages, you already know a translated scale is only as useful as the evidence behind it. This post shows a practical approach to qualitative analysis of translated scales using the recent Swedish validation of the New Sexual Satisfaction Scale–Short (NSSS‑S) (Klysing et al., published 25 Aug 2025). You’ll get a concise workflow to reproduce the study’s qualitative checks (item clarity, cultural fit, and respondent meaning) and concrete ways to accelerate them with AI-enabled tools like www.evidano.com. Target audience: UX/qual researchers, psychometricians, and policy teams who must validate instruments across languages while keeping rigour, traceability, and participant privacy.

Fast take: what the paper did and where to read it

Klysing et al. (25 Aug 2025) translated and evaluated the New Sexual Satisfaction Scale–Short (NSSS‑S) for Swedish-speaking respondents, reporting both psychometric properties and a qualitative evaluation of items. Read the original paper: journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0330353.

Why it matters: Translated scales need both statistical validation and qualitative evidence that items mean the same thing to respondents.
Payoff for you: Learn a repeatable, AI-accelerated workflow to run item-level qualitative checks and integrate them with psychometric analyses.

Findings snapshot

Item	Value	Note
Study	Psychometric + qualitative evaluation of a Swedish translation of the NSSS‑S	Klysing A. et al., PLOS ONE
Authors	Amanda Klysing; Ingela Steij Stålbrand; Laura del Carmen Sánchez‑Sánchez; Tove Lundberg	Listed on the paper
Publication date	25 Aug 2025	Use this date when citing the validation
Instrument	New Sexual Satisfaction Scale – Short (NSSS‑S)	12 items in the short form (sample instrument in supplement)
Methods	Psychometrics + qualitative evaluation	Paper reports both scale properties and qualitative checks
Original source	journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0330353	Primary reference (open access)

What the authors did (plain English)

The research team produced a Swedish translation of the NSSS‑S and evaluated it using two complementary lenses: statistical measurement properties (reliability, factor structure) and qualitative evaluation of items (how respondents understood and reacted to items). The goal: create a composite measure of sexual satisfaction that is valid for Swedish contexts, something the authors note was previously unavailable.

They combined quantitative psychometrics with qualitative checks to confirm item clarity and cultural fit.
The paper includes the translated short form and supporting material useful for replication or adaptation.

Implications for researchers: what this means for your instrument work

For psychometricians

Complement CFA and reliability statistics with qualitative evidence: item-level interviews or free-text feedback can reveal translation artefacts that distort factor solutions.

Keep a living log of translation decisions and respondent quotations to justify item retention or modification.

For UX / qualitative teams

Short cognitive probes (think‑aloud, paraphrase prompts) paired with thematic coding expose ambiguous wording faster than iterative round‑trips with translators.

Use cross-segment checks (age, gender, relationship status) to catch subgroup misinterpretations early.

For policy & health analysts

A translated composite score is only actionable when measurement invariance and respondent meaning are established, combine both evidence streams before using scores for decisions.

Document consent, translation notes and anonymised quotes for audit trails.

Do more, faster with Evidano (mapping features to the need)

Problem: scattered feedback and translators' notes

Solution: Import transcripts, translator notes, and survey free-text into Evidano to centralise evidence. Searchable source linking preserves provenance (who said what, in which language).

Problem: multilingual nuance and back‑translation

Solution: Evidano translation with custom dictionaries keeps technical terms and culturally loaded phrases consistent across versions; side‑by‑side originals and translations speed reviewer checks.

Problem: manual coding and inconsistent themes

Solution: Use Evidano AI-assisted coding to suggest themes, then lock a codebook and apply it across transcripts and survey responses for reproducible thematic counts and co‑occurrence networks.

Problem: combining qualitative and psychometric outputs

Solution: Export thematic frequencies and coded subgroups from Evidano to merge with your quantitative dataset for cross‑segment analysis (e.g., items flagged in interviews vs. subscale loadings).

Security & compliance

Evidano encrypts project data and does not use customer data to train third‑party models, useful for sensitive topics like sexual health.

Checklist: 7-step workflow to reproduce the qualitative evaluation

Follow this runbook to adapt the Swedish NSSS‑S approach for your translated instrument:

1) Gather materials: original items, translated items, translator notes, and any pilot free-text responses or cognitive interview transcripts.
2) Import into Evidano: upload transcripts, spreadsheets of free-text survey responses, and the translated instrument file.
3) Standardise language: apply custom dictionaries in Evidano to preserve domain terms and preferred translations.
4) Run AI-assisted coding: auto-suggest themes for item clarity, cultural fit and sensitivity; review and finalise the codebook.
5) Cross-segment analysis: compare themes by respondent subgroup and link quotes to item-level statistics.
6) Produce deliverables: extract quote packs, thematic frequency tables, and co‑occurrence visuals for the psychometrics team.
7) Iterate: use AI avatar interviews or short follow-up prompts to resolve ambiguous items and re-run steps 4–6.

Ethics note

This post frames sexual satisfaction measurement in a research context only. Instrument validation and analysis should follow ethical review, informed consent, and data minimisation practices; results are non‑diagnostic.

Wrapping up & next steps

Translating and validating a scale (as Klysing et al. did for the NSSS‑S on 25 Aug 2025) requires both psychometric rigor and qualitative evidence showing respondents interpret items as intended. Use the 7‑step workflow above to operationalise those checks and reduce rework.

Try a pilot: ingest one translator file and a small set of transcripts into www.evidano.com to see how quickly AI-assisted codes surface problematic items.
If you want a template for documenting translation decisions and exporting quote packs for psychometrics teams, start a free trial or request a demo at www.evidano.com.

Keep reading

Browse all articles