How the study used Evidano
The researchers used thematic analysis (Braun and Clarke) on anonymized semi-structured interview transcripts.
Identify themes by research question. Anonymized transcripts were uploaded and Evidano was used to identify themes by research question in the initial stage.
Compare and confirm coding. AI-generated coding was compared with the researcher's own coding, then the data was rerun a second time to confirm quotes aligned with specific themes and sub-themes.
Human review and validation. All AI-generated content was reviewed, revised, and validated by the first author for accuracy, relevance, consistency, and alignment with the research objectives.
Went through peer-review and journal submission process
The use of Evidano (previously AILYZE) was reported in the methods, named as the software in the author contributions, and noted in the acknowledgments. Transcripts were anonymized before analysis. This reflects a transparent, human-reviewable workflow.
How Evidano fit the workflow
- 1Upload anonymized interview transcripts to Evidano
- 2Evidano identifies themes by research question
- 3Compare with the researcher's coding, then rerun to confirm quote and theme alignment
- 4Researcher reviews, revises, and validates all output, naming four final themes
“All AI-generated content was reviewed, revised, and validated by the first author to ensure accuracy, relevance, consistency, and alignment with the research objectives.”
“AI technology was used as a thought partner to confirm and refine codes identified by the first author.”
About Evidano (previously AILYZE)
Evidano is AI-assisted qualitative data analysis software for interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, and documents. It supports AI-assisted thematic analysis with your own or an AI-suggested codebook, transcription and translation in 100+ languages, clickable quotes and citations, and exportable visual reports. End-to-end encryption, no third-party data sharing, and your data is not used to train AI. From USD 50/month for unlimited analysis.
Run the first pass in days, not weeks
Keep the judgment with you. Let Evidano do the heavy lifting on your interviews, focus groups, open-ended responses, and documents.
More case studies
Researchers at Oxford and Melbourne used AI to analyse their interview data
Evidano helped analyse interview transcripts in a peer-reviewed study, then was checked against manual coding.
A Stanford-led study used AI to cross-check its qualitative coding
A published mixed-methods study uploaded deidentified transcripts into Evidano to cross-check themes. Every AI code was reviewed by the researcher.
Researchers used AI for qualitative analysis. Human experts reached the same conclusions.
A published Cornell study used Evidano (previously AILYZE) for thematic analysis, and human experts reached the same conclusions.
Related published evidence
Researcher interviews and published citations covering comparable studies.
- Published research2026

A Braun & Clarke thematic analysis, AI-assisted and verified by researchers
Published in Frontiers in Education (2026): encrypted data, human-verified themes, and a transparent AI coding workflow.
9 Teachers interviewed
Frontiers in Education
- Published research2026

A UCLA dissertation ran three separate AI-assisted analyses of its qualitative data
A UCLA dissertation used Evidano for initial coding and theme generation across journals and interviews, then reviewed and refined every result.
18 students in the qualitative sample
UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations (eScholarship, University of California)
- Published research2026

A University of Split thesis used AI to triangulate its thematic coding
Initial thematic coding was processed through Evidano to support analytic triangulation, then reviewed and verified by the authors.
8 in-depth interviews
Croatian Digital Theses Repository (ZIR)
Explore more evidence
Researcher interviews, the wording authors published when citing Evidano, and accuracy comparisons against manual coding.
- Resource
Research spotlights: researchers in their own words
Interviews with researchers at leading universities and institutes about how they actually used Evidano in work they went on to publish.
- Resource
How Evidano was used, in published methods sections
Verbatim excerpts from 20 published studies describing what Evidano did in their analysis — as a thought partner, a second coder, for initial coding, or for synthesis.
- Resource
Methodology guides and research writing
Practical guides to qualitative methods — thematic analysis, grounded theory, evidence synthesis and more — alongside the wider Evidano article library.
- Resource
Human vs AI: validated accuracy benchmarks
Three head-to-head comparisons against expert human analysis — 371 interview transcripts with Arizona State and Penn State, 298 evaluation reports for a UN evaluation group, and UNICEF’s manual-coding review.
