What the publication shows
JET Education Services is an established education research and evaluation organisation. In its Annual Report 2023, "Working Towards Impact", the team describes an outcome harvesting evaluation. JET annual reports from 2011 to 2022 were reviewed by JET researchers and analysed using Evidano.
The tool was one of five evidence sources, alongside an internal staff survey, an external partner survey, project team engagements and a board workshop.
The report states the reports were "reviewed by JET researchers and analysed using AILYZE". Researchers stayed in the loop. The analysis supported their judgement rather than replacing it.
How Evidano fit the workflow
The workflow reported in the evaluation.
- 112 years of annual reports (2011 to 2022)
- 2Analysed with Evidano
- 3Reviewed by JET researchers
- 4Combined with surveys, a most significant change survey and a board workshop
- 5200+ outcomes harvested
“an artificial intelligence application designed for qualitative research”
Manual review and an AI-assisted workflow
Read years of documents by hand. Slow synthesis across many sources. Hard to trace where a finding came from.
Structured analysis across the full corpus. A faster route to candidate outcomes. Clickable quotes and citations for traceability.
Evidano was named openly in a published report. Transparent tool use, not hidden.
Analysis was reviewed by researchers. Evidano supports judgement, it does not replace it.
Described in the publication as designed for qualitative research. The tool also works with interviews, focus groups and open-ended responses.
Sits within recognised approaches such as outcome harvesting and most significant change.
About Evidano (previously AILYZE)
Evidano is AI-assisted qualitative data analysis software for interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, and documents. It supports AI-assisted thematic analysis with your own or an AI-suggested codebook, transcription and translation in 100+ languages, clickable quotes and citations, and exportable visual reports. End-to-end encryption, no third-party data sharing, and your data is not used to train AI. From USD 50/month for unlimited analysis.
Run the first pass in days, not weeks
Keep the judgment with you. Let Evidano do the heavy lifting on your interviews, focus groups, open-ended responses, and documents.
More case studies
AI-assisted analysis vs manual coding. UNICEF ran both.
Same 160 evaluations, two methods. See where Evidano matched human analysts and where humans stayed essential.
UN now using AI in evaluations
Inside a 2025 UN Development Programme evaluation: transparent, human-reviewed AI qualitative analysis.
AI-assisted qualitative analysis, used in a published UNESCO synthesis
Evidano (previously AILYZE) supported and triangulated the analysis behind UNESCO's 2025 Synthesis of Evaluations. See how AI-assisted qualitative analysis is being used, and disclosed, in published research.
Related published evidence
Researcher interviews and published citations covering comparable studies.
- Published research2025

A UNESCO evaluation used Evidano to analyze its reports.
A UN evaluation office used Evidano to scan reports and apply its own coding schema, with researchers reviewing throughout.
230 museum-related records refined with Evidano
Evaluation of UNESCO’s Museums Programme, IOS Evaluation Office
- Published research2025

How AI was used in an African Development Bank evaluation
Used to validate findings in an African Development Bank evaluation, within a human supervised workflow.
2,500+ operations in the portfolio under evaluation
African Development Bank Independent Development Evaluation (IDEV)
Explore more evidence
Researcher interviews, the wording authors published when citing Evidano, and accuracy comparisons against manual coding.
- Resource
Research spotlights: researchers in their own words
Interviews with researchers at leading universities and institutes about how they actually used Evidano in work they went on to publish.
- Resource
How Evidano was used, in published methods sections
Verbatim excerpts from 20 published studies describing what Evidano did in their analysis — as a thought partner, a second coder, for initial coding, or for synthesis.
- Resource
Methodology guides and research writing
Practical guides to qualitative methods — thematic analysis, grounded theory, evidence synthesis and more — alongside the wider Evidano article library.
- Resource
Human vs AI: validated accuracy benchmarks
Three head-to-head comparisons against expert human analysis — 371 interview transcripts with Arizona State and Penn State, 298 evaluation reports for a UN evaluation group, and UNICEF’s manual-coding review.
