What the study did
Researchers at the Centre for Ethics, Yenepoya (Deemed to be University) compared how five generative AI tools draft informed consent documents. To analyze the resulting text, Evidano was used for content analysis.
Five generative AI tools across six scenarios, each document comprising a participant information sheet and a consent form.
Published in Perspectives in Clinical Research, Vol 17(2), 2026 | Wolters Kluwer, Medknow | AI tool use disclosed in the methods
How Evidano fit the workflow
- 1Collect the documents
30 AI-drafted consent documents across six research scenarios.
- 2Run content analysis in Evidano
Evidano analyzed the documents for omissions, risky phrasing, and language patterns.
- 3Surface the findings
Recurring omissions and risky phrasing were identified, with representative document excerpts.
- 4Human review and reporting
Three trained assessors reviewed the documents; results were reported in the published study.
“content analysis was performed using the AILYZE tool to identify omissions, risky phrasing, and tool-specific language patterns”
“Content analysis from the AILYZE tool revealed recurring omissions and risky phrasing across all tools”
AI tool use was disclosed in the methods and cited as a reference in the paper.
Evidano supported the analysis; trained human assessors reviewed the documents.
About Evidano (previously AILYZE)
Evidano is AI-assisted qualitative data analysis software for interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, and documents. It supports AI-assisted thematic analysis with your own or an AI-suggested codebook, transcription and translation in 100+ languages, clickable quotes and citations, and exportable visual reports. End-to-end encryption, no third-party data sharing, and your data is not used to train AI. From USD 50/month for unlimited analysis.
Run the first pass in days, not weeks
Keep the judgment with you. Let Evidano do the heavy lifting on your interviews, focus groups, open-ended responses, and documents.
More case studies
AI-assisted qualitative analysis is moving into published research
See how researchers used Evidano to triangulate their thematic analysis, without replacing their own judgment.
Used in a peer-reviewed, WHO-backed study: AI-assisted thematic analysis
Peer-reviewed in 2025, with the AI outputs cross-checked and validated by the research team.
A 2026 peer-reviewed study used AI to strengthen its thematic analysis
How Evidano produced a complementary codebook and 11 granular themes in a 2026 peer-reviewed study.
Related published evidence
Researcher interviews and published citations covering comparable studies.
- Published research2025

A UNESCO evaluation used Evidano to analyze its reports.
A UN evaluation office used Evidano to scan reports and apply its own coding schema, with researchers reviewing throughout.
230 museum-related records refined with Evidano
Evaluation of UNESCO’s Museums Programme, IOS Evaluation Office
- Published research2025

How AI was used in an African Development Bank evaluation
Used to validate findings in an African Development Bank evaluation, within a human supervised workflow.
2,500+ operations in the portfolio under evaluation
African Development Bank Independent Development Evaluation (IDEV)
- Published research2025

AI-assisted peer-reviewed policy brief
UK government–funded research across three countries, with AI support
3 countries studied (Sudan, Nigeria, Mali)
SPARC policy brief
Explore more evidence
Researcher interviews, the wording authors published when citing Evidano, and accuracy comparisons against manual coding.
- Resource
Research spotlights: researchers in their own words
Interviews with researchers at leading universities and institutes about how they actually used Evidano in work they went on to publish.
- Resource
How Evidano was used, in published methods sections
Verbatim excerpts from 20 published studies describing what Evidano did in their analysis — as a thought partner, a second coder, for initial coding, or for synthesis.
- Resource
Methodology guides and research writing
Practical guides to qualitative methods — thematic analysis, grounded theory, evidence synthesis and more — alongside the wider Evidano article library.
- Resource
Human vs AI: validated accuracy benchmarks
Three head-to-head comparisons against expert human analysis — 371 interview transcripts with Arizona State and Penn State, 298 evaluation reports for a UN evaluation group, and UNICEF’s manual-coding review.