Company
HomeContactBlogsGuides
About
FeaturesThematic Analysis SoftwareAI Thematic AnalysisAI Qualitative CodingQuote TraceabilityMultilingual AnalysisCompare QDA ToolsPlansCase StudiesData SecurityHow We Trained Our AI ModelsAffiliate ProgramHow to Cite & Journal AI PoliciesCompare Evidano with Other SolutionsCertified TrainersHuman vs AIEnvironmental Impact
Preview Evidano
View sample AI docx/pdf analysisView sample AI xlsx/csv analysisView sample AI audio transcriptionCreate/ Speak with demo AI avatar interviewerPreview AI ChatbotAI Detection
Account
LoginRegister for Free Plan (free forever, no expiry)Book demo
Newsletter

Product updates, research, and tips — straight to your inbox.

© Evidano, All Rights Reserved.

Privacy PolicyTerms of Service
Loading chat...
Case Studies/Centre for Ethics, Yenepoya (Deemed to be University)
Used in published researchYenepoya University logo

A peer-reviewed study ran its content analysis with AI

A 2026 study in Perspectives in Clinical Research (Wolters Kluwer, Medknow) used Evidano to analyze AI-drafted informed consent documents. Evidano is AI software for qualitative data analysis.

Try Evidano freeBook a demo
View the published study
5
AI tools compared
30
Consent documents analyzed
6
Research scenarios

What the study did

Researchers at the Centre for Ethics, Yenepoya (Deemed to be University) compared how five generative AI tools draft informed consent documents. To analyze the resulting text, Evidano was used for content analysis.

Five generative AI tools across six scenarios, each document comprising a participant information sheet and a consent form.

Published in Perspectives in Clinical Research, Vol 17(2), 2026 | Wolters Kluwer, Medknow | AI tool use disclosed in the methods

How Evidano fit the workflow

  1. 1
    Collect the documents

    30 AI-drafted consent documents across six research scenarios.

  2. 2
    Run content analysis in Evidano

    Evidano analyzed the documents for omissions, risky phrasing, and language patterns.

  3. 3
    Surface the findings

    Recurring omissions and risky phrasing were identified, with representative document excerpts.

  4. 4
    Human review and reporting

    Three trained assessors reviewed the documents; results were reported in the published study.

“content analysis was performed using the AILYZE tool to identify omissions, risky phrasing, and tool-specific language patterns”
— From the publication, Methodology
“Content analysis from the AILYZE tool revealed recurring omissions and risky phrasing across all tools”
— From the publication, Discussion
Transparent use

AI tool use was disclosed in the methods and cited as a reference in the paper.

Researcher oversight

Evidano supported the analysis; trained human assessors reviewed the documents.

About Evidano (previously AILYZE)

Evidano is AI-assisted qualitative data analysis software for interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, and documents. It supports AI-assisted thematic analysis with your own or an AI-suggested codebook, transcription and translation in 100+ languages, clickable quotes and citations, and exportable visual reports. End-to-end encryption, no third-party data sharing, and your data is not used to train AI. From USD 50/month for unlimited analysis.

Run the first pass in days, not weeks

Keep the judgment with you. Let Evidano do the heavy lifting on your interviews, focus groups, open-ended responses, and documents.

Try Evidano freeBook a demo

More case studies

American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition logoHealth & Clinical

AI-assisted qualitative analysis is moving into published research

See how researchers used Evidano to triangulate their thematic analysis, without replacing their own judgment.

10
dietitians interviewed
2025
Springer Nature logoHealth & Clinical

Used in a peer-reviewed, WHO-backed study: AI-assisted thematic analysis

Peer-reviewed in 2025, with the AI outputs cross-checked and validated by the research team.

2025
Peer-reviewed publication in Drugs - Real World Outcomes
2025
University of the Philippines sealHealth & Clinical

A 2026 peer-reviewed study used AI to strengthen its thematic analysis

How Evidano produced a complementary codebook and 11 granular themes in a 2026 peer-reviewed study.

11
granular themes from the Evidano codebook
2026

Related published evidence

Researcher interviews and published citations covering comparable studies.

  • Published research2025
    UNESCO logo

    A UNESCO evaluation used Evidano to analyze its reports.

    A UN evaluation office used Evidano to scan reports and apply its own coding schema, with researchers reviewing throughout.

    230 museum-related records refined with Evidano

    Evaluation of UNESCO’s Museums Programme, IOS Evaluation Office

  • Published research2025
    African Development Bank Group logo

    How AI was used in an African Development Bank evaluation

    Used to validate findings in an African Development Bank evaluation, within a human supervised workflow.

    2,500+ operations in the portfolio under evaluation

    African Development Bank Independent Development Evaluation (IDEV)

  • Published research2025
    SPARC logo

    AI-assisted peer-reviewed policy brief

    UK government–funded research across three countries, with AI support

    3 countries studied (Sudan, Nigeria, Mali)

    SPARC policy brief

Explore more evidence

Researcher interviews, the wording authors published when citing Evidano, and accuracy comparisons against manual coding.

  • Resource

    Research spotlights: researchers in their own words

    Interviews with researchers at leading universities and institutes about how they actually used Evidano in work they went on to publish.

  • Resource

    How Evidano was used, in published methods sections

    Verbatim excerpts from 20 published studies describing what Evidano did in their analysis — as a thought partner, a second coder, for initial coding, or for synthesis.

  • Resource

    Methodology guides and research writing

    Practical guides to qualitative methods — thematic analysis, grounded theory, evidence synthesis and more — alongside the wider Evidano article library.

  • Resource

    Human vs AI: validated accuracy benchmarks

    Three head-to-head comparisons against expert human analysis — 371 interview transcripts with Arizona State and Penn State, 298 evaluation reports for a UN evaluation group, and UNICEF’s manual-coding review.

← All case studies