Evidano home
Peer-reviewed article · Administrative Theory & Praxis · 2026Taylor & Francis Group logo
Peer-reviewed article

ENAP and CUNY used AI-assisted qualitative analysis on 5,211 federal-worker comments

In a 2026 study in Administrative Theory & Praxis (Routledge / Taylor & Francis), researchers at the École nationale d’administration publique and CUNY College of Staten Island used Evidano to analyze 5,211 federal-worker comments across two surveys, with human review of every result.

The study used Evidano, then published as AILYZE.

5,211
survey comments analyzed
7
theoretical mechanisms coded
2
survey waves (Feb & May 2025)

The study

The study examined how U.S. federal workers experienced the early months of the Department of Government Efficiency. The raw material was thousands of open-ended responses to two Federal News Network surveys, the kind of corpus that is slow to read and code by hand.

The team applied Moynihan’s seven-mechanism framework of how politicization undermines state capacity deductively, using Evidano to process the corpus, then validated every output themselves. The most frequently invoked mechanisms were public servants’ exit, followed by a chilling effect, and the comments shifted from immediate shock in February to disengagement by May.

How Evidano fit the workflow

As described in the data-analysis section.

  1. 1
    Import a large corpus

    Thousands of open-ended comments from two surveys loaded for analysis.

  2. 2
    Apply a deductive framework

    Extraction queries built on the seven-mechanism typology let the assistant identify themes and sub-themes.

  3. 3
    Get traceable output

    Each theme came with textual excerpts and citations from the source corpus.

  4. 4
    Human review and validation

    Researchers reviewed all AI-generated results, checking theme interpretation and citation accuracy.

“an AI-powered conversational assistant designed to facilitate the analysis of large text corpora.”
— From the publication, describing AILYZE (now Evidano)
“The themes are accompanied by transparent justifications, including textual excerpts and citations from the corpus, for traceability.”
— From the publication
“The comments reveal a shift from immediate shock in February to structural collapse and disengagement by May.”
— From the publication, Abstract

The bottleneck, and the alternative

Manual only

Reading thousands of comments by hand. Manual coding against a framework. Separate hunting for quote evidence. Hard to scale across waves.

With Evidano

AI-assisted processing of a large corpus. Deductive queries map comments to themes. Themes returned with excerpts and citations. Human review retained throughout.

Disclosed AI use

The tool and method are described openly in the data-analysis section.

Human-validated

All AI-generated results were reviewed, validated, and corrected by the researchers.

Traceable to source

Themes were tied back to excerpts and citations from the original data.

Private by design

Per the paper, imported data is encrypted and not used to train AI models.

About Evidano (previously AILYZE)

Evidano is AI-assisted qualitative data analysis software for interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, and documents. It supports AI-assisted thematic analysis with your own or an AI-suggested codebook, transcription and translation in 100+ languages, clickable quotes and citations, and exportable visual reports. End-to-end encryption, no third-party data sharing, and your data is not used to train AI. From USD 50/month for unlimited analysis.

Run the first pass in days, not weeks

Keep the judgment with you. Let Evidano do the heavy lifting on your interviews, focus groups, open-ended responses, and documents.