The research context
The review, published in the proceedings of the national scientific meeting of Indonesia’s government trainers (widyaiswara), combined a systematic literature review with a bibliometric approach across 30 Scopus-indexed articles published between 2018 and 2024. To map how the papers connected on the theme of communication in coaching, the author turned to Evidano.
The five themes Evidano surfaced
Given about 20 papers and an analytic context focused on communication in coaching, Evidano returned five findings, each described and tabulated in the paper: mismatched expectations between coach and coachee; coach and coachee relationship dynamics; organizational influence; coach and coachee fit; and the influence of organizational culture.
Why this matters for credibility
A clear example of Evidano as a research assistant, with the researcher keeping interpretation and judgment: 15 papers were also reviewed by hand to minimize bias and build a more comprehensive review than electronic tools alone would allow.
How Evidano fit the workflow
From raw papers to reviewable themes, with the researcher in the loop.
- 1Input the corpus
Around 20 papers were loaded into Evidano.
- 2Set the analytic context
The author focused the analysis on communication aspects of coaching.
- 3Surface the themes
Five themes emerged, each described and tabulated in the paper.
- 4Researcher review
The author also reviewed 15 papers by hand to minimize bias and build a more comprehensive review.
“AILYZE can create simple analyses of the analyzed literature and help the researcher understand the findings.”
“The researcher input about 20 journals into the AILYZE application, then gave it the analytic context of keywords on the communication aspect of coaching.”
Evidano is named in both the methodology and the results, with its five themes tabulated.
Manual review of 15 papers ran alongside the AI-assisted step.
The author combined tools and methods to reduce bias.