Scaffolding In-Service Science Teachers for Developing Epistemic Empathy
Authors: V. Bologna & C. Bembich
Affiliation: University of Trieste, Italy
Published in: Education and New Developments 2025
Method: Mixed-methods, inductive thematic analysis
Disclosed, named, and cited
The authors named Evidano (previously AILYZE) directly in their methods section, with full attribution. An example of transparent, traceable AI use in a published research workflow.
How Evidano fit the workflow
- 1Qualitative input
Open-ended survey responses from the participating teachers.
- 2Inductive thematic analysis in Evidano
Themes identified across the entire dataset.
- 3Reported output
Findings synthesized into a report on the program's effectiveness.
“The analysis was conducted using AILYZE software, employing an inductive approach to identify themes across the entire dataset.”
“This method avoids the limitations of traditional coding by capturing broader themes and complex discussions, ensuring consistent theme detection and speeding up the analysis process.”
Why researchers are looking
Slow, line-by-line coding. Risk of inconsistent theme detection. Harder to capture complex discussions.
Inductive themes across the whole dataset. Consistent theme detection. Faster, with researcher oversight.
Benefits above reflect how the publication describes the analysis method.
About Evidano (previously AILYZE)
Evidano is AI-assisted qualitative data analysis software for interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, and documents. It supports AI-assisted thematic analysis with your own or an AI-suggested codebook, transcription and translation in 100+ languages, clickable quotes and citations, and exportable visual reports. End-to-end encryption, no third-party data sharing, and your data is not used to train AI. From USD 50/month for unlimited analysis.
Run the first pass in days, not weeks
Keep the judgment with you. Let Evidano do the heavy lifting on your interviews, focus groups, open-ended responses, and documents.
More case studies
Researchers at Oxford and Melbourne used AI to analyse their interview data
Evidano helped analyse interview transcripts in a peer-reviewed study, then was checked against manual coding.
A Stanford-led study used AI to cross-check its qualitative coding
A published mixed-methods study uploaded deidentified transcripts into Evidano to cross-check themes. Every AI code was reviewed by the researcher.
Researchers used AI for qualitative analysis. Human experts reached the same conclusions.
A published Cornell study used Evidano (previously AILYZE) for thematic analysis, and human experts reached the same conclusions.
Related published evidence
Researcher interviews and published citations covering comparable studies.
- Published research2024

A William & Mary research team used Evidano (previously AILYZE) to analyze 3,443 participants’ open-ended responses
AI-assisted thematic analysis, verified by human researchers, in a published Mensa Foundation report.
3,443 participants in the study
Mensa Foundation report
- Published research2026

A Braun & Clarke thematic analysis, AI-assisted and verified by researchers
Published in Frontiers in Education (2026): encrypted data, human-verified themes, and a transparent AI coding workflow.
9 Teachers interviewed
Frontiers in Education
- Published research2026

A UCLA dissertation ran three separate AI-assisted analyses of its qualitative data
A UCLA dissertation used Evidano for initial coding and theme generation across journals and interviews, then reviewed and refined every result.
18 students in the qualitative sample
UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations (eScholarship, University of California)
Explore more evidence
Researcher interviews, the wording authors published when citing Evidano, and accuracy comparisons against manual coding.
- Resource
Research spotlights: researchers in their own words
Interviews with researchers at leading universities and institutes about how they actually used Evidano in work they went on to publish.
- Resource
How Evidano was used, in published methods sections
Verbatim excerpts from 20 published studies describing what Evidano did in their analysis — as a thought partner, a second coder, for initial coding, or for synthesis.
- Resource
Methodology guides and research writing
Practical guides to qualitative methods — thematic analysis, grounded theory, evidence synthesis and more — alongside the wider Evidano article library.
- Resource
Human vs AI: validated accuracy benchmarks
Three head-to-head comparisons against expert human analysis — 371 interview transcripts with Arizona State and Penn State, 298 evaluation reports for a UN evaluation group, and UNICEF’s manual-coding review.
