The study at a glance
Topic studied: Community knowledge and perceptions of anthrax in farming communities near game management areas in Zambia.
Published in: PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, peer-reviewed and open access, 2025.
Method: Reflexive thematic analysis (Braun and Clarke) combined with AI tools in a hybrid approach.
Evidano's role: Evidano ran AI-assisted sentiment analysis on the focus group transcripts.
How Evidano was used
The study reports these signals added depth to themes including Impact of Anthrax on Communities, Social Impacts, and Risk Perceptions.
How Evidano fit the workflow
The study describes AI as an aid used to complement, not replace, human judgment.
- 1Transcripts prepared
Focus groups recorded, transcribed verbatim, and translated into English.
- 2AI-assisted sentiment analysis
Evidano detected emotional tone across the transcripts to guide the analysis.
- 3Human validation and synthesis
Researchers cross-referenced outputs with verbatim quotes and finalized themes through multiple validation rounds.
“AILYZE 2.3 contributed an emotional dimension by detecting heightened anxiety and mistrust.”
“AI's potential as an analytical aid while highlighting the essential role of human expertise.”
About Evidano (previously AILYZE)
Evidano is AI-assisted qualitative data analysis software for interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, and documents. It supports AI-assisted thematic analysis with your own or an AI-suggested codebook, transcription and translation in 100+ languages, clickable quotes and citations, and exportable visual reports. End-to-end encryption, no third-party data sharing, and your data is not used to train AI. From USD 50/month for unlimited analysis.
Run the first pass in days, not weeks
Keep the judgment with you. Let Evidano do the heavy lifting on your interviews, focus groups, open-ended responses, and documents.
More case studies
AI-assisted analysis vs manual coding. UNICEF ran both.
Same 160 evaluations, two methods. See where Evidano matched human analysts and where humans stayed essential.
UN now using AI in evaluations
Inside a 2025 UN Development Programme evaluation: transparent, human-reviewed AI qualitative analysis.
AI-assisted qualitative analysis, used in a published UNESCO synthesis
Evidano (previously AILYZE) supported and triangulated the analysis behind UNESCO's 2025 Synthesis of Evaluations. See how AI-assisted qualitative analysis is being used, and disclosed, in published research.
Related published evidence
Researcher interviews and published citations covering comparable studies.
- Published research2025

AI-assisted qualitative analysis is now appearing in published research
A university research team used Evidano to turn 8 interviews into a thematic codebook, with researcher review.
8 interview transcripts analyzed
Journal of Education Research
- Published research2026

AI-assisted qualitative analysis just showed up in published research
A peer-reviewed 2026 Education Sciences study used Evidano (previously AILYZE) to refine its qualitative analysis, with full researcher oversight.
22 courses' open-ended SET comments analyzed
Education Sciences
- Published research2025

AI Thematic Analysis
A 2025 mixed-methods education study cited Evidano (previously AILYZE) in its methods to identify themes across teachers' open-ended responses.
75 teachers in the training program
Education and New Developments 2025
Explore more evidence
Researcher interviews, the wording authors published when citing Evidano, and accuracy comparisons against manual coding.
- Resource
Research spotlights: researchers in their own words
Interviews with researchers at leading universities and institutes about how they actually used Evidano in work they went on to publish.
- Resource
How Evidano was used, in published methods sections
Verbatim excerpts from 20 published studies describing what Evidano did in their analysis — as a thought partner, a second coder, for initial coding, or for synthesis.
- Resource
Methodology guides and research writing
Practical guides to qualitative methods — thematic analysis, grounded theory, evidence synthesis and more — alongside the wider Evidano article library.
- Resource
Human vs AI: validated accuracy benchmarks
Three head-to-head comparisons against expert human analysis — 371 interview transcripts with Arizona State and Penn State, 298 evaluation reports for a UN evaluation group, and UNICEF’s manual-coding review.
