Pemanfaatan ChatGPT sebagai Asisten Belajar Matematika (ChatGPT as a mathematics learning assistant)
Ahmad Mumtaz Anwari and Joko Soebagyo examined how vocational-school students used ChatGPT as a mathematics-learning assistant and how they perceived that experience.
The study focused on students whose teacher allowed the tool during learning. Interview data provided the qualitative evidence, and the analysis looked beyond whether students used ChatGPT to how they integrated it into schoolwork and what support they still needed.
Where Evidano fit
The published abstract states that interview data was analyzed through a thematic technique supported by Evidano, cited under its previous name AILYZE.
The disclosure is concise, so the description here is equally precise: Evidano supported thematic analysis of the student interviews. The paper is not an accuracy benchmark, and it does not show that the platform independently produced the final conclusions.
What the study found
The authors report that students saw multiple academic uses for ChatGPT and generally perceived it positively. At the same time, the findings placed teacher support at the center of effective use.
The resulting message is collaborative rather than substitutional. ChatGPT can help students obtain explanations and support learning, but educators remain important for guiding use, validating responses, and connecting the technology to instructional goals.
The authors conclude that successful integration requires collaboration among stakeholders so that AI contributes to mathematical understanding rather than becoming an unchecked answer source.
Why this case matters
This case adds geographic and linguistic breadth to Evidano’s public research record. It also addresses a timely question for schools: how students experience general-purpose AI when it is actually allowed in learning.
For education researchers, the case demonstrates a straightforward interview-to-themes workflow. For teachers and administrators, its main lesson is equally practical: adoption should be designed around guidance, verification, and learning goals.
Limits and publication note
The publicly indexed abstract does not state the final number of participants, interview length, exact prompts, codebook, or validation process.
The article is published in Indonesian; its original title is kept above, and the findings on this page are paraphrased in English.
How Evidano fit the workflow
- 1Select an authentic classroom case
The study focused on vocational students already allowed to use ChatGPT.
- 2Interview students about use and perception
The qualitative material captured practical experience rather than hypothetical attitudes.
- 3Analyze interviews thematically in Evidano
Recurring ideas were organized across the interview material.
- 4Interpret the themes educationally
The authors connected tool use with academic support, student perception, and the continuing role of teachers.
Interviews were analyzed in the language they were conducted in.
A straightforward path from transcripts to reportable themes.
The authors drew the educational conclusions from the themes.
The paper names the tool used for its thematic analysis.