For many parents, family life is built from small exchanges: a request for breakfast, a question about school, a glance that means comfort is needed. When a child communicates differently, those ordinary exchanges can become difficult to read, and love has to travel through gestures, routines, patience, and repeated attempts at understanding.
About Mehak Afzal

Mehak Afzal is an MPhil Applied Linguistics scholar at GIFT University in Gujranwala, Pakistan. Her academic work is connected to applied linguistics and English language research, with this article focusing on autism, family communication, and parental emotional wellbeing. In the featured study, she and her co-authors used interviews with parents of autistic children to examine how communication differences shape family life and parental distress. Her contribution places qualitative inquiry in conversation with a pressing local issue: the need for better communication support for autistic children and emotional support for their parents in Pakistan.
About the authors
- Mehak Afzal (MPhil Applied Linguistics Scholar, GIFT University, Pakistan)
- Javed Iqbal (In-charge and Lecturer, Department of English, II-TECH, Gujranwala, Pakistan)
- Areeba Tanveer (English Instructor, Roots Millennium School, Gujranwala, Pakistan)
- Arslan Ali (Lecturer, Department of English, GIFT University, Gujranwala, Pakistan)
Read the article
Read the full research article, “Insights into Communication Differences of ASD Children and their Parents’ Emotional State,” published in Advance Social Science Archive Journal (volume 4, issue 1) in 2025.
Full citation
Afzal, M., Iqbal, J., Tanveer, A., & Ali, A. (2025). “Insights into Communication Differences of ASD Children and their Parents’ Emotional State”. Advance Social Science Archive Journal, 4(1), 1635–1643. doi.org/10.55966/assaj.2025.4.1.091
We are grateful to Mehak Afzal, Javed Iqbal, Areeba Tanveer, and Arslan Ali for their contribution to research on autism, communication, and family wellbeing, and for referencing AILYZE, now Evidano, as part of their research process.
Related published research
Other published studies and evaluations that used Evidano on comparable material.
- Published research2026

UP Manila medical education study: AI thematic analysis produced an 11-theme codebook
How Evidano produced a complementary codebook and 11 granular themes to strengthen the dependability of a 2026 reflexive thematic analysis.
11 granular themes from the Evidano codebook
Annals of Medicine and Medical Sciences (AMMS) Vol. 05, 2026, pp. 161–166, open access
- Published research2025

Arizona State University’s AI thematic analysis of therapy-dog handler interviews
Disclosed in the methods, validated by the researcher, and rerun to confirm quote alignment, in a peer-reviewed Education Sciences study (2025).
7 handler interviews analyzed, 45 to 60 minutes each
Education Sciences (MDPI), 15(7), 929, open access
- Published research2026

Volda and Melbourne researchers used AI interview analysis to triangulate manual coding
Two researchers coded 11 interviews by hand with over 90% agreement, then ran the anonymised transcripts through Evidano and compared the results for triangulation and validation.
209 survey participants, a 97% response rate
Educational Psychology 46(1): 27–51 (Routledge / Taylor & Francis), open access
Explore more evidence
The full case-study library, the wording researchers published when citing Evidano, and how its output compares with manual coding.
- Resource
Case studies in published research
Peer-reviewed studies, UN evaluations and university research where teams used Evidano for AI-assisted qualitative analysis — with the methods, the numbers and the published source for each.
- Resource
How Evidano was used, in published methods sections
Verbatim excerpts from 20 published studies describing what Evidano did in their analysis — as a thought partner, a second coder, for initial coding, or for synthesis.
- Resource
Methodology guides and research writing
Practical guides to qualitative methods — thematic analysis, grounded theory, evidence synthesis and more — alongside the wider Evidano article library.
- Resource
Human vs AI: validated accuracy benchmarks
Four head-to-head comparisons against expert human analysis — 371 interview transcripts with Arizona State and Penn State, 298 evaluation reports, 224 open-ended survey responses with UT Austin and Wichita State, and a 160-response manual-coding review.
